Writing
my History 601 Final Paper was an eye-opening experience. After having
completed Hist 301 during the final semester of my undergraduate program (It
was supposed to have been done during my first semester in upper division
coursework and as a transfer student I had not been informed), I was ready for
the super-heavy, reading-laden trench work of 601. The semester went fairly
well as we read various works, including That Noble Dream by Peter Novick and
The Cheese and the Worms by Carlo Ginzburg. We learned about the development of
the profession of History and how we were to embark on a mission to educate the
world about humanity and all of its glories and follies.
For
my final, I chose to write a paper on The Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten
Holocaust of World War II, by Iris Chang. Of course, as I had done the entire
semester, I waited until the last minute to research and write my paper. We
were reading books at the pace of one a week; with work, children and a needy
girlfriend occupying most of my time, I was forced to read the books in one or
two days. I am a quick reader. Although digesting the information, interpreting
it, formulating an argument and selecting passages for support and evidence are
more than simply reading a text. I needed more time than I was allowing myself
for each assignment, and the 7/10 that I was consistently earning never quite
pierced the veil of my brain and translated to the raw 70% that would
eventually become a B, which led to a lower average than I needed to maintain
in order to remain in good standing within the graduate program.
So
there I was, one week left to write my final paper, and of course life did not
slow down to accommodate me. I did not use enough sources and one of the ones
that I had selected was known for being written by a very lousy example of a
historian. I would have known that, had I done more research and examined more
sources. I look back and recall the large stack of books I used for my history
301 paper and I can’t understand why I didn’t think to do the same with Hist
601. I remember making three or four trips to the library looking for sources for my 301 paper (Which was on the relationships between Churchill, Stalin and Roosevelt and Truman during WWII) and I even bought one book for 25cents as an additional source. Somehow, that commitment wasn't there for hist 601. Was it hubris? Was I so full of myself after being accepted into the Master’s
program that my academic standards became inexplicably lax? I believe so. I was
forced to face the truth: I hadn’t only let myself down; I let down every
professor who wrote a letter of recommendation for me as well.
I
learned a very valuable lesson in Hist 601, and that lesson is that no matter
how skilled we might be the effort has to accompany that skill and be infused
into every work. The first great job you do, regardless of the form, format,
field, etc., sets the bar for the future. Each assignment should improve on the
previous one in any way possible. Each subsequent piece of work should include
no less effort than the one before it. Following this ideology, I have been
able to produce high-quality work even when the subject matter fails to mesmerize
me. I realized that if my standards drop, then so shall the rewards. And
frankly, I want platinum medals, not bronze ones.
-JohnThursday, June 13, 2013